Previously Martin Schulze wrote: > I made a quick check of the Packages file from slink and found > these possible showstoppers: I'm guessing you only looked at packages in main? > I wonder what we're going to do about them. Wichert, can you monitor > them? I guess I shall files some bug reports. I'll try to keep up.. > Package: crypt++el 2.84-3 > Unmet recommendation: mailcrypt I'm guessing mailcrypt is in non-us, so either this package should be moved to contrib or the recommendation should be downgraded to a Suggest. > Package: vrwave 0.9-1 > Unmet dependency: jdk1.1-runtime|jdk-shared|jdk-static This package should be moved to contrib, the jdk stuff is not in main. > Package: vrwave 0.9-1 > Unmet dependency: unzip unzip isn't in main, so this should be downgraded to a Suggests or vrwave should be moved to contrib. > Package: mutt 0.94.15-2 > Unmet recommendation: gnupg gnupg is in non-us, I don't think we have a policy on dependencies on packages in non-us. I suggest downgrading the recommendation to a suggest. > Package: yorick-dev 1.4-9 > Unmet dependency: xdevel xdevel? That doesn't exist.. > Package: boot-floppies 2.0.11 > Unmet dependency: slang0.99.38-pic iirc a new versino if slang is needed. > Package: most 4.7-1.1 > Unmet dependency: slang0.99.38 Same. > > Package: debian-cd 2.0.2 > Unmet dependency: unzip See comments for vrwave. > Does anybody object about its removal? Do you mean with `its' all mentioned packages? If so I definitely object since I don't want to miss mutt. Also debianp-cd might be usefull if we ever want to produce CD-images... Wichert.
Attachment:
pgpdmjou1_IVz.pgp
Description: PGP signature