Re: buffer overflow in ssh IT IS A STUPID JOKE!!

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: buffer overflow in ssh IT IS A STUPID JOKE!!
From: Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 15:29:56 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 19981103152956.C5401@cs.leidenuniv.nl>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.04.9811021846180.1412-100000@red.blood.int>; from Anthony C. Zboralski on Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 06:48:32PM +0100
References: <[🔎] 19981102170922.A2596@wi.leidenuniv.nl> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.04.9811021846180.1412-100000@red.blood.int>

Previously Anthony C. Zboralski wrote:
> sissies!

Euh, I'm not even going to comment on that one.

> This advisory was CANCELLED on Nov. 1, 1998 without ever having been
> issued.

That is correct. However that does *not* mean there are no issues with
ssh, only that IBM felt their advisory was incorrect.

Wichert.

--
Debian GNU/Linux      .    Security Managers      .   security@debian.org
	      debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
  Christian Hudon     .     Wichert Akkerman      .     Martin Schulze
<chrish@debian.org>   .   <wakkerma@debian.org>   .   <joey@debian.org>

Attachment: pgpnBhYkbcTXn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: buffer overflow in ssh
  - From: "J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)" <jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl>
- Re: buffer overflow in ssh IT IS A STUPID JOKE!!
  - From: "Anthony C. Zboralski" <acz@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: NT and Debian dual boot?
Next by Date: Re: Bash in xterm under x*3.3.2.3a-6
Previous by thread: Re: buffer overflow in ssh IT IS A STUPID JOKE!!
Next by thread: Re: developer status again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread