Constituion - current status
I hereby reduce the minimum discussion period for the constitutional
discussion to 7 days. [s4.2]
Brian Basset's email wasn't working again when I mailed him recently.
I think that Brian's email is too unreliable, and think the job should
be given to Darren Benham, as he's the only person with a demonstrated
working vote taking setup. Since we haven't formally adopted the
constitution, and given the large time delay involved since Brian
volunteered, I hereby retract my nomination of Brian as initial
Project Secretary and appoint Darren Benham instead.
There are currently four unaccepted amendments proposed:
Pretty much anyone can force a vote (Darren Benham)
Removal of SPI section (Ian Jackson)
Trivial changes provision (Ian Jackson)
Change `seconder' to `sponsor' (Ian Jackson)
The current state is therefore that we could force a vote now, or wait
for Guy to accept one or all of these amendments. I would rather that
Guy did not accept the SPI amendment, because I'd rather the
developers voted on it.
Alternatively, I could re-propose the whole resolution myself, and
then we'd still have to wait a week, but Guy wouldn't need to confirm
anything.
Ian.
Reply to: