Re: Afterstep classic

To: Joel Rosdahl <joel@rosdahl.ml.org>, chris@ormond.unimelb.edu.au, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Afterstep classic
From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@efis.ucr.ac.cr>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 19:06:18 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980701190618.A1294@efis.ucr.ac.cr>
Mail-followup-to: Joel Rosdahl <joel@rosdahl.ml.org>, chris@ormond.unimelb.edu.au, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <19980627163725.A14004@earthlink.net>; from Rev. Joseph Carter on Sat, Jun 27, 1998 at 04:37:25PM +0000
References: <19980627043600.A12966@earthlink.net> <199806270948.LAA22553@fjorr.rydnet.lysator.liu.se> <19980627163725.A14004@earthlink.net>

> I'm sorry, I missed that---I thought you had the old bo package there.
> I've got the stuff all but downloaded now and will repackage it shortly.
> Should it be called afterstep1.0 or afterstep-classic you think? I was
> going to quite literally flip a coin. <g>

I'd vote for afterstep-classic (or afterstep-traditional, the former sounds
like Coke[TM] advertising) because if the rumours about restarting
development from that branch are true, then I'd guess there will be a 1.1
eventually.


				Marcelo


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Afterstep classic
  - From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@earthlink.net>

Prev by Date: Re: dpkg hooks (was Re: Upgrade report from "bo" to "hamm")
Next by Date: Re: GNUnification
Previous by thread: Upgrade README
Next by thread: Re: Afterstep classic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread