Re: emacs19-el standard priority?
Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
> But we have still the issue about emacs19-el, which was not standard
> in bo and would make a standard hamm install somewhat larger than bo.
Yes, emacs19-el should not be standard, it should be optional, IMO.
OTOH, I don't know if it's release critical. Can someone with more
authority than me raise a bug on emacs19-el, and decide what severity
to put it at? And one against emacs20, I guess.
--
.....A. P. Harris...apharris@onShore.com...<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: