Re: RFC: The BTS, "Severity: Fixed", etc. (Was: An idea for the BTS)
Wichert Akkerman writes:
> Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > I think that not only should bugs be marked by the
> > distributions they exist in, they should also be classified by
> > architecture;
>
> Actually, I think we can do the same way more efficent. Each bug already
> has a Version-number. Now we if we add a field Fixed-in-Version the BTS
> can simply look for which architectures the fixed version is available.
No, that's not so simple. As already explained, and with a recent
example, I fixed a specific bug in kbd_0.95-16 and kbd_0.96a-4. It
does occur in all versions bewteen and including 0.96-1 and 0.96a-3.
Filling a Fixed-in-Version field with either of 0.95-16 or 0.96a-4
would be wrong. We don't want that.
--
Yann Dirson <ydirson@mygale.org> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer,
isp-email: <ydirson@a2points.com> | support Debian GNU/Linux:
debian-email: <dirson@debian.org> | more powerful, more stable !
http://www.mygale.org/~ydirson/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: