Re: kernel 2.0.34 and hamm

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: kernel 2.0.34 and hamm
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 09:54:25 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980608095425.K3613@test.legislate.com>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19980608140932.A6718@cogs.susx.ac.uk>; from Luis Francisco Gonzalez on Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 02:09:32PM +0100
References: <[🔎] 19980606132316.Y3613@test.legislate.com> <[🔎] 199806071234.FAA26803@earth.laney.edu> <[🔎] 19980607141001.J3613@test.legislate.com> <[🔎] 19980608140932.A6718@cogs.susx.ac.uk>

Luis Francisco Gonzalez <luisgh@cogs.susx.ac.uk> wrote:
> Precisely, in bo the boot-floppies had to disable pcmcia because it was
> broken. I guess you never had to install using a pcmcia network card.
> If we make changes to the kernels, let's make sure there is no broken
> dependent package.

I don't see any problem with using boot-floppies with an older
kernel.

-- 
Raul


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: kernel 2.0.34 and hamm
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Re: kernel 2.0.34 and hamm
  - From: Jim <jim@laney.edu>
- Re: kernel 2.0.34 and hamm
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Re: kernel 2.0.34 and hamm
  - From: Luis Francisco Gonzalez <luisgh@cogs.susx.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#22928: New upstream security fix release
Next by Date: Re: so what? Re: Debian development modem
Previous by thread: Re: kernel 2.0.34 and hamm
Next by thread: Re: kernel 2.0.34 and hamm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread