Re: first package

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: first package
From: Michael Dietrich <mdt@mdt.in-berlin.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 02:18:03 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980603021803.F372@mdt.in-berlin.de>
Reply-to: mdt@mdt.in-berlin.de
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19980603020339.E372@mdt.in-berlin.de>; from Michael Dietrich on Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 02:03:39AM +0200
References: <[🔎] 19980603020339.E372@mdt.in-berlin.de>

> but the second error seems to be more serious. in line 1 of my
> changelogfile is nothing wrong compared to the script. it just says:
> 	z (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
> (my package is called 'z' for now) is the name a problem (too short)?
renamed it to zet: that works. so debian package names are more than
one chars long? seams to be a bug in build? (whatever sense it makes
to have that short names)

-- 
see header


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: first package
  - From: Eric Leblanc <jughead@generation.net>

References:
- first package
  - From: Michael Dietrich <mdt@mdt.in-berlin.de>

Prev by Date: first package
Next by Date: Re: Linuxconf not losing info.
Previous by thread: first package
Next by thread: Re: first package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread