Re: More formal proposals
Richard Braakman writes ("More formal proposals"):
...
> 2. I propose the following typographical corrections to the Constitution:
> - in s.3.2, second paragraph, replace "evelopers" with "developers".
> - in s.5.1.1, replace "Techical" with "Technical".
> - in s.5.2.5, from "Votes are in leadership elections are kept secret",
> strike the first "are".
> - in s.5.2.7, replace "decision" with "decision".
> - in s.5.2.7, replace "Resulution" with "Resolution".
> - in s.6.3.4, replace "commitee" with "committee".
> - in appendix A, replace "decisonmaking" with "decisionmaking".
> - in appendix B, replace "consitution" with "constitution".
Fixed these, and at least one other `decison'.
> 3. I propose the following typographical corrections which I am less
> sure about:
> - in s.5.1.4, replace "noone" with "no-one".
> - in s.5.3, replace "overemphasizing" with "over-emphasizing".
> - in A.5.5, replace "Transferrable" with "Transferable".
> (the former might be British spelling? I'm not sure.)
> - throughout, replace "decisionmaking" with "decision making".
I disagree with these. That's just my quirky style :-).
> 4. I propose the following clarification:
> - in s.8.2, first sentence, replace "their" with "the Leader's".
> Rationale: the "their" seems to be a false plural that refers
> back to "the Leader". This is confusing because there is also
> a real plural ("The Delegates") available.
Fixed these.
> Since I have no urge to vote on these changes if Ian Jackson does
> not accept them, I do not ask for seconds.
You needn't have proposed them as a motion - I can amend the
resolution as I want anyway ...
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: