Re: Formal amendment to the proposed Constituition
I second this proposed ammendment.
Bob
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> proposed the folowing ammendment:
> Hi,
>
> I wish to propose A Formal Amendment to the Proposed
> constituition.
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 1 A) Move to remove clause 4.1.3
> 2----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 3 3. Override any decision by the Project Leader or a Delegate.
> 4----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 5 And replace it by:
> 6
> 7----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 8 3. Override any decision by the Project Leader, Technical
> 9 Committee or a Delegate.
> 10----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 11
> 12 B) Replace 4.2.2 and 4.2.2.1
> 13 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 14 2. Delaying a decision by the Project Leader or their Delegate:
> 15 1. If the Project Leader or their Delegate has made a decision,
> 16 then Developers can override them by passing a resolution to
> 17 do so; see s4.1(3).
> 18 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 19 And replace it by:
> 20 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 21 2. Delaying a decision by the Project Leader, Technical
> 22 Committee or their Delegate:
> 23 1. If the Project Leader, Technical Committee or their
> 24 Delegate has made a decision, then Developers can
> 25 override them by passing a resolution to do so; see
> 26 s4.1(3).
> 27 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 28
> 29 C) Replace Section 6.1.4
> 30----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 31 4. Overrule a developer (requires a 3:1 majority).
> 32 The Technical Committee may ask a developer to take a particular
> 33 technical course of action even if the developer does not wish to;
> 34 this requires a 3:1 majority. For example, the Committee may
> 35 determine that a complaint made by the submitter of a bug is
> 36 justified and that the submitter's proposed solution should be
> 37 implemented.
> 38----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 39
> 40 And replace it by
> 41----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 42 4. Overrule a developer (requires a 3:1 majority in a vote by the
> 43 Technical Committee). The Technical Committee may ask a
> 44 developer to take a particular technical course of action even
> 45 if the developer does not wish to; this requires a 3:1 majority
> 46 of all the Technical Committee members currently seated. For
> 47 example, the Committee may determine that a complaint made by
> 48 the submitter of a bug is justified and that the submitter's
> 49 proposed solution should be implemented.
> 50----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> manoj
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard <hilliard@metrolink.net>
|_) (_) |_) Palm City, FL USA PGP Key ID: A8E40EB9
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: