Re: List of bugs that *must* be fixed before freezing Hamm
In article <[🔎] 871zx7m9mo.fsf@wsuse5.mckesson.com>,
Stephen Zander <stephen.zander@interlock.mckesson.com> wrote:
>Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
>> But we could still avoid a little inconvenience to the poor user by
>> adding the Conflicts line.
>>
>> It is really so much work?
>
>But how many more packages will need it? emacs can't be the only
>package with this problem!
It is my opinion that one shouldn't have to bother if it concerns
packages that have _only_ been released in "unstable". After all, it
_is_ unstable. If you upgrade from bo to hamm (once released) and there
is no problem - then there is no problem ..
Mike.
--
Miquel van Smoorenburg | The dyslexic, agnostic, insomniac lay in his bed
miquels@cistron.nl | awake all night wondering if there is a doG
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: