Re: procps
On Thu, Jan 08, 1998 at 03:13:05PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 1998 at 03:10:19PM +0100, Bart Schuller wrote:
> > I mut say I find the policy with respect to split or renamed packages
> > getting stuck in Incoming suboptimal. First e2fsprogsg, now killall.
>
> Please file a bugreport against ftp.debian.org so Guy remembers this.
Note that this is probably already covered:
#4378: Dependencies should be checked automatically
#9857: ftp 'dinstall' needs to check dependancies
Ray
--
UNFAIR Term applied to advantages enjoyed by other people which we tried
to cheat them out of and didn't manage. See also DISHONESTY, SNEAKY,
UNDERHAND and JUST LUCKY I GUESS.
- The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: procps
- From: Bart Schuller <schuller@lunatech.com>
- References:
- Re: procps
- From: Bart Schuller <schuller@lunatech.com>
- Re: procps
- From: Scott Ellis <storm@gate.net>
- Re: procps
- From: Bart Schuller <schuller@lunatech.com>
- Re: procps
- From: Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>