Re: please upgrade your packages to current standards
Sten Anderson wrote:
> Now you are at it, I suggest that you also scan the archive for packages
> that fails to include a "Section" and/or "Priority" field. It is far
> too many, and it is quite annoying.
Do we want all packages to include the Section and Priority fields?
If so, then I think it is far more effective to change dpkg's default
behaviour so that it does include these fields, rather than requiring
an explicit flag -isp.
However, I don't know the history behind this. What is the reason for
not including Section and Priority by default?
Richard Braakman
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: