RE: Looking for a reason to not orphan my howto
Do you mean bo or hamm? I do not have a problem with libc5 on my hamm
machine. And I don't know what's the problem with libc5-dev especially
why it should be in hamm.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes@topsystem.de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes@debian.org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Schulze [SMTP:joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE]
> Sent: Friday, January 02, 1998 12:41 AM
> To: Meskes, Michael
> Subject: Re: Looking for a reason to not orphan my howto
> Importance: High
>
> On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 08:23:04PM +0100, Meskes, Michael wrote:
> > libc5-dev for hamm??? And what's wrong with libc5 in hamm?
> >
> > IMO it's a waste of time to upgrade the bo version now that we're
> close
> > to completing hamm.
>
> No it's not. If we don't have a working libc5 for hamm people
> can't upgrade. This would break the whole debian philosopy.
>
> Regards
>
> Joey
>
> --
> / Martin Schulze * joey@infodrom.north.de * 26129 Oldenburg /
> / Erfahrung ist eine nützliche Sache /
> / Leider macht man sie immer erst kurz nachdem man sie brauchte / <<
> File: ATT00075.ATT >>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: