On Thu, Dec 31, 1998 at 11:11:04PM +1100, Martin Mitchell wrote: <snip> > > What's a better name for a cross-compiler package? > > gcc-crosscompiler-m68k-linux comes to mind, but that's very long for a > > package name. The current names are unambiguous, and already in use. > > That name is too long IMO. How about gcc-cross-m68k-linux? (Still a bit long though) gcc-m68k-linux is too ambiguous.. As would be gcc-c-m68k-linux, however, once we find a good name I don't suppose we could standardize on the convention for all cross arch tools? (Be in compiler or assembler or....) Zephaniah E, Hull. > > Martin. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com > -- PGP EA5198D1-Zephaniah E, Hull <firstname.lastname@example.org>-GPG E65A7801 Keys available at http://whitestar.soark.net/~warp/public_keys. CCs of replies from mailing lists are encouraged.
Description: PGP signature