[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packages difference in different slink arches (was Re: slinkcd v0.95 m68k & Alpha organization)

On Thu, Dec 31, 1998 at 11:11:04PM +1100, Martin Mitchell wrote:
> > What's a better name for a cross-compiler package?
> > gcc-crosscompiler-m68k-linux comes to mind, but that's very long for a
> > package name. The current names are unambiguous, and already in use.
> That name is too long IMO.

How about gcc-cross-m68k-linux? (Still a bit long though)
gcc-m68k-linux is too ambiguous..
As would be gcc-c-m68k-linux, however, once we find a good name I don't
suppose we could standardize on the convention for all cross arch tools?
(Be in compiler or assembler or....)

Zephaniah E, Hull.
> 	Martin.
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

 PGP EA5198D1-Zephaniah E, Hull <warp@whitestar.soark.net>-GPG E65A7801
    Keys available at http://whitestar.soark.net/~warp/public_keys.
           CCs of replies from mailing lists are encouraged.

Attachment: pgpccCkcGuY4c.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: