Re: libjpeg62 vs. libjpegg6a (was Re: Debian violates GPL?)
Jim Pick wrote:
> For the other ports, it's going to vary depending on what -dev
> packages the porters had installed. For new recompiles, everybody
> should be using libjpeg62-dev. The libjpeg-dev and libjpegg-dev
> packages should be moved to the oldlibs section.
libjpeg-dev should be removed, actually. It has no source, and
its dependencies cannot be satisfied in slink. Only libhdf4g-dev
still depends on it (mistakenly), I've raised the bugreport on
that to severity important.