Re: mass bug reporting on guile 1.2
Craig Brozefsky <email@example.com> writes:
> Hamish Moffatt <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > I've just received two identical bug reports on geda saying it
> > depends on guile 1.2. One was from email@example.com,
> > the other was from firstname.lastname@example.org. Neither of these
> > look valid; the message text was identical.
> > Would anyone care to explain? The bug report is legitimate,
> > but I don't need two identical copies from dodgy-looking
> > addresses.
> Is guile1.2 going to be in slink? I was really hopeing it could stick
> around. I presently use it for some work because it's I/O is a bit
> faster than guile1.3 (tho unsafe on some platforms, debian not one of
Nope, it's been removed. It was released as part of hamm though, so
you can always go back and fish it out of there.