[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mass bug reporting on guile 1.2

Craig Brozefsky <craig@onshore.com> writes:

> Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> writes:
> > I've just received two identical bug reports on geda saying it
> > depends on guile 1.2. One was from noone@hatchet.bluff.org,
> > the other was from buggy55@hotmail.com. Neither of these
> > look valid; the message text was identical.
> > 
> > Would anyone care to explain? The bug report is legitimate,
> > but I don't need two identical copies from dodgy-looking
> > addresses.
> Is guile1.2 going to be in slink?  I was really hopeing it could stick
> around.  I presently use it for some work because it's I/O is a bit
> faster than guile1.3 (tho unsafe on some platforms, debian not one of
> them).

Nope, it's been removed.  It was released as part of hamm though, so
you can always go back and fish it out of there.


 - Jim

Reply to: