Re: Bug#30739: When a tiny part of a package uses non-free libraries
Brian Mays wrote:
> > Michael Meskes wrote:
> > > I do think it should go into main, yes.
> > > Otherwise, as a maintainer, I would just provide the program under
> > > /usr/doc to work around this stuff.
> Peter S Galbraith <GalbraithP@dfo-mpo.gc.ca> wrote:
> > I'd read that as contempt for the DFSG.
> I think that Michael meant that he would place the source under
> /usr/doc, say in an examples subdirectory. Since the source can be
> freely distributed, there is no harm in that.
Oh. I apologize then. I misunderstood.