Re: isdnutils and 2.0.36 (was: Linux 2.0.36 in slink?)
On Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 1998 at 01:21:52PM -0800, Oscar Levi wrote:
> > It is unwise to change the kernel just before we ship. I support
> > making it optional for the minority of people who use ISDN adaptors.
> And what about the "minority of people" that care about security holes in
> our default 2.0.35 kernel?
Those people compile their own kernels anyway. :-)
How many people would be opposed to including a kernel-source package for
the 2.0.36 kernel, leaving 2.0.35 the 'standard' kernel for slink? I don't
think it would break anything, and compiling your own kernel really isn't
that hard anymore.