Re: licensing issue - which list?

To: Ossama Othman <othman@astrosun.tn.cornell.edu>, Debian Developer's List <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: licensing issue - which list?
From: Martin Schulze <joey@tapiola.Infodrom.North.DE>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 19:27:17 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 19981214192717.D15590@tapiola.infodrom.north.de>
Reply-to: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.GSO.4.02.9812141150410.27512-100000@breezy.tn.cornell.edu>; from Ossama Othman on Mon, Dec 14, 1998 at 11:52:33AM -0500
References: <[🔎] 19981214174844.A7482@troi.orgatech.de> <[🔎] Pine.GSO.4.02.9812141150410.27512-100000@breezy.tn.cornell.edu>

Ossama Othman wrote:
> > > Where should I send e-mails regarding licensing issues?  Specifically,
> > > there is disagreement about TAO's license between Debian and the TAO
> > > developers.

> By the way, debian-legal doesn't appear to be on the subscription web
> page.  Did I miss it?

Because I'm too lame, it seems.  I'll add this list tonight.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
Install joe (Joey's Own Editor)     correct: Joe's Own Editor

Please always Cc to me when answering on the lists.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: licensing issue - which list?
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@linux.de>
- Re: licensing issue - which list?
  - From: Ossama Othman <othman@astrosun.tn.cornell.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Nomination question: Redhat
Next by Date: OCAML Debian package
Previous by thread: Re: licensing issue - which list?
Next by thread: Re: licensing issue - which list?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread