Re: Proposal: a more general and flexible appoach of packages.
> > a) Use firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com in the maintainer field
> > of package foo.
> That still leaves in the dependency on the physical maintainer. It also
> makes the information in the Packages file authoritative for the
> maintainer information. This is Bad for several reasons, only one of them
> being that the Packages file might be outdated.
The database is created out of the .dsc files, regenerated daily.
Linux - the choice of a GNU generation
Please always Cc to me when answering on the lists.