> On Tue, Dec 08, 1998 at 10:43:52PM -0600, Dale James Thompson wrote: > > > Should I upload again with the binary named fbrowser? > > Please do... after fixing a little nitpick (read on...) > > > I changed the name of the package to fbrowser when someone else pointed > > out the namespace pollution problem. But, in the package I left the binary > > named f. > > The pollution problem is more serious then. /usr/bin/X11/f is *not* nice. I > don't want to > > $ f > > and have a file manager launched. That's precisely the kind of situation the > name-space pseudo-policy is trying to address: hard to remember names, names > that can be easily mistyped (as in this case, where I left of a 'd'). We > have enough two-letter commands (ls, mv, cp, bc, cc, nm, ar, mt, ps, ci, co, > nl, as, uz, wc...); the only one-letter commands accepted are [ and w (did I > miss anything?) > > That aside, I'd really like to see the package, sounds good! > > > Marcelo I've uploaded it again with all f's changed to fbrowser's, including those in the sorce code. The program created a ~/.f directory now it uses ~/.fbrowser.
Attachment:
pgpwteZpgkaXX.pgp
Description: PGP signature