Re: libc6 needs >= 2.0.7u (Closes: dpkg-shlibdeps is too strict
Joel Klecker writes:
> At 16:08 -0500 1998-12-06, Raul Miller wrote:
> >At 14:08 -0500 1998-12-06, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> >> >libstdc++2.8 (=2.90.29-1), libstdc++2.9 (=2.91.58), libstdc++2.9 (=2.91.59)
> >> >
> >> >Does this work for everyone?
> >
> >I think it's the right choice.
> >
> >Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org> wrote:
> >> What's wrong with libstdc++2.9 (<< 2.91.59-1), libstdc++2.8 (<< 2.90.29-2)?
> >> BTW, only i386 needs these conflicts, the other architectures aren't
> >> affected.
> >
> >This forces unnecessary upgrades, which can play hell with keeping
> >a server working properly.
>
> OK, I see it now, I do notice an unnecessary conflict though, the
> libstdc++2.9 (=2.91.59) one, 2.91.59-{1,2} are not broken by libc6 >=
> 2.0.7u-6.
Correct. The two 2.91.59-{1,2} versions are compiled against a proper libc6.
Reply to: