[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Oddities about jpeg_6a, advice requested



On Sun, Dec 06, 1998 at 03:57:53PM -0800, Oscar Levi wrote:
> I was given the impression by Tom Lane that 6b and 6a were binary
> compatible.  Is it about a name change? 


They are not.

> It's about consistency.  Not important, but helpful.

The consistency change I would like to see is renaming the libjpeg6b
source package to libjpeg62, personally.


Dan

/--------------------------------\  /--------------------------------\
|       Daniel Jacobowitz        |__|     CMU, CS class of 2002      |
|   Debian GNU/Linux Developer    __   Part-Time Systems Programmer  |
|         dan@debian.org         |  |        drow@cs.cmu.edu         |
\--------------------------------/  \--------------------------------/


Reply to: