Re: Oddities about jpeg_6a, advice requested
On Sun, Dec 06, 1998 at 03:57:53PM -0800, Oscar Levi wrote:
> I was given the impression by Tom Lane that 6b and 6a were binary
> compatible. Is it about a name change?
They are not.
> It's about consistency. Not important, but helpful.
The consistency change I would like to see is renaming the libjpeg6b
source package to libjpeg62, personally.
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| CMU, CS class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Part-Time Systems Programmer |
| dan@debian.org | | drow@cs.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
Reply to: