Re: Ian's DFSG2 would harm Debian and Free Software
>>"John" == John Hasler <email@example.com> writes:
John> Dale Scheetz writes:
>> With a proper license forking is no problem, and the freedom that is
>> maintained is the users freedom to choose the original work over the
>> forked version. Properly used "immutable source" provides additional
>> freedoms not provided in other licenses.
John> I think that doubling the amount of source that must be distributed
John> could qualify as a problem.
An inconvenience, maybe. Does that make the original software
non free? I do not think so. Note that this doubling is in effect
only when one forks. Isolating one;s fork from the original version
maybe a good idea in the first place. Just because patch only forks
are not possible should not make software non-free.
John> I do not favor evicting "patch clause" licenses from the DFSG, but that
John> doesn't mean I like them.
My sentiments as well.
Better than a thousand pointless verses is one stanza on hearing
which one finds peace. 101
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E