Re: Intent of package LDP

[Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu>]

Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:

   On 30 Nov 1998, Ben Pfaff wrote:

   > So example code is under the GPL.  This is different from the manuals
   > themselves being under another license.  Unless I misunderstand the
   > situation, this makes sense to me.

   Ah, I understand. I was thinking about the manuals in source form
   i.e. the .sgml file.

   Ok, but then the manuals themselves are not DFSG-compliant, are they?

   [ Point 3. "Derived Works" would fail, since you have to ask
     for permission ].

That is the way that I see it.