Re: __register_frame_info: A complete scan
On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Jason Gunthorpe writes:
> > On Sun, 29 Nov 1998, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > > All these binaries need to be recompiled for slink; they will break with
> > > the new libc6. I excluded C++ binaries from the scan, since they don't
> > > need to be recompiled -- they just need an updated libstdc++.
> > Is this actually right? AFAIK NO library or aplication should define this
> > as a dynamic symbol, it should always be statically linked. Has anyone
> > asked the egcs people about it?
> AFAIK the libc6/libm defining the __register_frame_info symbol was
> compiled by an egcs-1.0.x or a self installed egcs.
> Before asking, I
> want to verify, that this is still the case with the current
> egcs-1.1.1 prerelease #4.
libc 2.0.7u-5 compiled with egcs 1.1.1 had __register_frame_info defined,
too. But this is not the question. The question is whether libstdc++2.9
should define it or not. Because now it does.
Madarasz Gergely email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
It's practically impossible to look at a penguin and feel angry.
Egy pingvinre gyakorlatilag lehetetlen haragosan nezni.