Re: __register_frame_info: A complete scan
Jason Gunthorpe writes:
>
> On Sun, 29 Nov 1998, Richard Braakman wrote:
>
> > All these binaries need to be recompiled for slink; they will break with
> > the new libc6. I excluded C++ binaries from the scan, since they don't
> > need to be recompiled -- they just need an updated libstdc++.
>
> Is this actually right? AFAIK NO library or aplication should define this
> as a dynamic symbol, it should always be statically linked. Has anyone
> asked the egcs people about it?
AFAIK the libc6/libm defining the __register_frame_info symbol was
compiled by an egcs-1.0.x or a self installed egcs. Before asking, I
want to verify, that this is still the case with the current
egcs-1.1.1 prerelease #4.
Matthias
PS: The first egcs-1.1.0.91.59 upload was corrupted :-( Is there any
way that I can verify that the files are correctly built?
Reply to: