Re: Draft new DFSG - r1.4
Robert Edmonds <email@example.com> writes:
>On Sat, 28 Nov 1998, Zephaniah E, Hull wrote:
>> All in all I think I much prefer this approach over rewriting the DFSG..
>> For all the little flaws, the current DFSG is known, tested, and
>> accepted. Minor changes to correct flaws and patch holes are fine,
>> but a complete rewrite of a accepted standard? Is this /REALLY/
>> what we want to do?
>> Zephaniah E, Hull.
><aol>me too!</aol> ;)
- Jim Van Zandt