On Thu, Nov 26, 1998 at 11:23:28PM -0800, Chris Waters wrote: > > B. Why are `modifications as patch only' licenses not allowed ? > > As others have mentioned, I think this is an EXTREMELY bad time to > forbid patch-only licenses. And, no disrespect for anyone intended, > but I have a lot more respect and trust for the opinions of RMS than I > do for *anyone* in the Debian organization, including myself! If RMS is > willing to declare the QPL a free license, that's good enough for me. It's bad to do it at all! Please find my other message about this subject. -- Show me the code or get out of my way.
Description: PGP signature