Re: Draft new DFSG
Hi,
>>"Andreas" == Andreas Jellinghaus <aj@dungeon.inka.de> writes:
Andreas> a standart is created, if people agree to do things the same
Andreas> way.
Indeed.
Andreas> please consider doing things like www.open-source.org, and
It would have been nice if we could have done that. Very
nice. Unfortunately, I don't trust the current standard bearers of
the OSI to entrust the core of the distribution to them. I think
their judgement is flawed.
Andreas> drop the dfsg. even if its better, i do not consier it
Andreas> important enough to have two differnt ideas of free software
Andreas> or open source software.
You have got to be kidding. This is not important enough? I
consider this to be the core of the distribution, this, and the
social contract, define wht we stand for. This is probably the most
important defining document for the project.
manoj
--
"My sense of purpose is gone! I have no idea who I AM!" "Oh, my
God... You've.. You've turned him into a DEMOCRAT!" Doonesbury
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: