[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: intent to package paxutils

In article <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.981126112208.2152C-100000@cantor.unex.es> you wrote:

: Mmm, why do you call it "FSF package"? Is it distributed at alpha.gnu.org?

No particular reason.

FSF/GNU/whatever.  The current paxutils sources are on a machine at U Montreal,
but the primary maintainer is the maintainer of the GNU tar package, and it 
seems clear to me that this package will have the same status as other FSF/GNU
packages when it is completed.

The tar pre-release versions were mirrored to alpha.gnu.org, I haven't looked
to see if paxutils is there, too.  It's not particularly important to me.


Reply to: