On Wed, Nov 25, 1998 at 10:15:06PM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote: > j> wording. This would effectively plug all loopholes and give Ian a > j> chance to talk us into throwing out particular licenses that he finds > j> repugnant even if they are technically in compliance. > > I object. If a license is DFSG compliant, there must not be a way to > exclude a package from main. The issue is that one can write a license which is very much not free and stull happens on a technicality to fit the DFSG. -- Show me the code or get out of my way.
Description: PGP signature