On Sun, Nov 22, 1998 at 11:50:04PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: <snip> > Going with 2.1 glibc for slink would be _STUPID_. I'm with you on this one.. > Going with it for potato, especially if the release schedule stays > anything like it is projected to be, could be a very good idea. There > are relatively few problems... I'm also with you here, and have added reason, as potato is going to be targeted for 2.2.x kernels it needs some of the features in glibc 2.1 (namely some of the newer pty support, tho that may have been back ported), so I guess that after slink is released we will be doing some major work to get potato rolling on the new libc AND the new set of kernels, fun... Zephaniah E, Hull.. > > Dan > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com > -- PGP EA5198D1-Zephaniah E, Hull <firstname.lastname@example.org>-GPG E65A7801 Keys available at http://whitestar.soark.net/~warp/public_keys. CCs of replies from mailing lists are encouraged.
Description: PGP signature