Re: glibc recompiling was Re: libc resolver problem solved (critical bug)
On Thu, 19 Nov 1998, Brian White wrote:
> > > My inclination is to "move along" to the new libraries ASAP, rebuilding
> > > those packages that were built with -5. Any other step looks like lost
> > > ground that will eventually have to be covered, so why not do it now?
> > As I noted in one of my previous posts, please add a conflict against
> > current libstdc++ because this new libc will break all c++ apps linked
> > against libstdc++2.9 (i'm not sure if it is just the library or the apps
> > too :( ), like apt, dselect, etc...
> I assume it just breaks a specific version of libstdc++2.9, right?
Thats right, breaks that version which was compiled with a broken libc.
But it breaks the apps too.
Madarasz Gergely email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
It's practically impossible to look at a penguin and feel angry.
Egy pingvinre gyakorlatilag lehetetlen haragosan nezni.