Re: Qt license change
> > That's kind of pointless since we couldn't, for example, let KDE
> > accompany Qt.
Joseph Carter <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> It's beginning to look (as if it didn't from the last time this thread came
> up) like you're nitpicking because you simply don't WANT Qt, KDE, or both to
Nope, I'm fine with KDE as long as they license it properly. [For that
matter, I was the one who proposed that they add an extra rider on the
GPL as a way of achieving this -- sometime around June].
I did make a mistake on my analysis of the license, and I do promise
I'll read it a few more times before posting anything further on
> FWIW, the system library exception should not be what allows KDE in main.