Re: cc'ing (was Re: Mozilla goes GTK+ instead of Qt)

["Steve Lamb" <morpheus@teleute.ml.org>]

On 31 Oct 1998 20:32:09 +0000, James Troup wrote:

>>     If that were the case

>What do you mean `If'?  It is.

    Then why do it half assed?

>> they'd set the reply-to so people wouldn't be forced to group reply
>> and then trim.

>No they wouldn't, please don't start this tired thread again.  The
>Reply-To issue has been done to death, go and read the archives.

    I didn't, just pointing out, again, what I pointed out before (check the
archives yourself) that the "problems" associated with the reply-to being set
are outweighed by people who don't trim when it ISN'T set.  

    I'm on of the few people that appears to trim.  I can't think of the last
post that I made here, aside from this one and your reply, where I didn't get
two copies.  One from the list, one CC'd.  That is a near daily occurance
with me.

    OTOH I don't remember the last time *EVER* when I sent something to the
list that I didn't mean to.  
 
    Do the math.

-- 
         Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
         ICQ: 5107343          | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------