Re: [<warp@whitestar.soark.net>] Bug#27841: apt: apt depends on a missing library
>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
Dan> See, it's not "Is anyone going to?" or "Do we agree we
Dan> should?" right now. It's "does anyone but Dan have the time
Dan> to look at http://master.debian.org/~dan and figure out why
Dan> the compiled libstdc++2.8 package whose source is there is
Dan> missing a lot of important symbols". I can't figure it out.
Ben> The source in http://master.debian.org/~dan in the libstdc
Ben> sir is for 2.9. Could this be the problem?
Dan> I present
Dan> http://master.debian.org/~dan/libstdc/libstdc++_2.90.29-1.dsc
Dan> for your enjoyment...
Dan> Notice it says Binary: libstdc++2.8.
Wow. How does 2.90 compile out to become 2.8?
--
Brought to you by the letters U and N and the number 8.
"Frungy! Frungy! Frungy!!" -- ZokFotPik, SCII
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.
Reply to: