[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [<warp@whitestar.soark.net>] Bug#27841: apt: apt depends on a missing library



warp@whitestar.soark.net wrote:

> Ok, do we have a consensus?
> 2.8 should go back in slink, but marked as a oldlib.
> 
> All packages which we have source to should be recompiled with 2.8 if
> possable?                                                        ^
                                                                   |
          You of course ment 2.9, but everyone knew that, right ? :)

> Any disaggreement?

Nope, not from me...

-- 
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are
 / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \  Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@debian.org>
( D | e | b | i | a | n ) Debian Certified Linux Developer
 \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/  Surrey/B.C./Canada
-- 
kibo KGB Peking Soviet Saddam Hussein fissionable Panama SEAL Team 6
bomb NSA arrangements Khaddafi $400 million in gold bullion Mossad
Nazi

Attachment: pgpUhv3SEtksX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: