Re: KDE hurts Qt (LICENSES)
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Alan: This is a perfect example of FUD!
> > SuSE has the biggest rate of growth of all Linux distributors in
> > the US.
>
> And SuSE and Red Hat and all of them put together are not worth a US lawsuit
> yet. Price yourself a US lawsuit then judge again.
>
> Make them 5 times bigger and yes then its worth it.
Wrong! If you are not protecting your rights. You are running into the
danger that you loose a case because you did accept the wrong behaviour
too long in case you had detailed information years before.
Just threadening with sueing is simply an action of FUD.
I therefore make the following _personal_ offer to you and RMS:
I will link GNU Emacs to kde and distribute the resulting source and
binary to you and RMS.
You then have to sue ME or shut up!
Sorry for my harsh words. But it looks to me like some people are trying
to keep kde people from making even better free software because they do
have trouble to succeed with their own competing project.
Regards,
-- martin
// Martin Konold, Herrenbergerstr. 14, 72070 Tuebingen, Germany //
// Email: konold@kde.org //
Anybody who's comfortable using KDE should use it. Anyone who wants to
tell other people what they should be using can go to work for Microsoft.
John.Giasi@ummed.edu: "BCPL gave birth to B, and the child of B was of
course C, since the ancestor of X is W, so the
sucessor to X must be K."
Reply to: