[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: KDE hurts Qt (LICENSES)



On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Alan Cox wrote:

Dear Alan,

> What you have to remember is this.
> 
> 	SuSE are currently too small to be worth sueing in the US
> 	on a licensing issue. Ditto most (all ?) other current
> 	distributors
> 
> I'm not trying to belittle people like SuSE quite the opposite - Im
> confident SuSE will end up big enough to be worth sueing in the USA on
> such matters. What happens then ?

Alan: This is a perfect example of FUD!

>From ESR`s hackers dictionary:
":FUD: /fuhd/ n. Defined by Gene Amdahl after he left IBM to found
   his own company: "FUD is the fear, uncertainty, and doubt that IBM
   sales people instill in the minds of potential customers who might
   be considering [Amdahl] products."  The idea, of course, was to
   persuade them to go with safe IBM gear rather than with
   competitors' equipment.  This was traditionally done by promising
   that Good Things would happen to people who stuck with IBM, but
   Dark Shadows loomed over the future of competitors' equipment or
   software.  See {IBM}.

:FUD wars: /fuhd worz/ n. [from {FUD}] Political posturing engaged in
   by hardware and software vendors ostensibly committed to
   standardization but actually willing to fragment the market to
   protect their own shares.  The UNIX International vs. OSF conflict
   is but one outstanding example."


Facts: Unix does have most of its acceptance in Europe in contrast to the 
       US.
       SuSE is the most popular Linux distributor in Europe.
       SuSE has the biggest rate of growth of all Linux distributors in
       the US.
     


-- martin

// Martin Konold, Herrenbergerstr. 14, 72070 Tuebingen, Germany  //
// Email: konold@kde.org                                         //
Anybody who's comfortable using KDE should use it. Anyone who wants to
tell other people what they should be using can go to work for Microsoft.
John.Giasi@ummed.edu: "BCPL gave birth to B, and the child of B was of 
                       course C, since the ancestor of X is W, so the 
		       sucessor to X must be K."




Reply to: