Re: Bad signature!! [was: Re: LICENSES]
- To: warp@whitestar.soark.net, Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>, Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
- Cc: Steve Lamb <morpheus@teleute.ml.org>, debian-devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bad signature!! [was: Re: LICENSES]
- From: Zed Pobre <zed@moebius.interdestination.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 01:48:39 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19981010014839.C17966@moebius.interdestination.com>
- Mail-followup-to: warp@whitestar.soark.net, Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>, Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>, Steve Lamb <morpheus@teleute.ml.org>, debian-devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
- Reply-to: Zed Pobre <zed@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19981010023617.B1966@whitestar.soark.net>; from warp@whitestar.soark.net on Sat, Oct 10, 1998 at 02:36:17AM -0400
- References: <[🔎] 19981009221343.L20969@debian.org> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.05.9810101525200.18872-101000@siva.taz.net.au> <[🔎] 19981010023617.B1966@whitestar.soark.net>
On Sat, Oct 10, 1998 at 02:36:17AM -0400, warp@whitestar.soark.net wrote:
> I'm not going to get into the debate at all at the moment however as I
> was reading through it I noticed that this message did not match the
> signature, would someone care to varify who actualy sent this message
> and what the contents were when it was signed?
Craig Sanders does not routinely sign his mail. Joseph Carter
does. Upon closer examination, one will find that the PGP/MIME
signature from Joseph Carter's previous message got attached to Craig
Sanders' reply (an impressive message quoting feat, albeit a stupid
one... Craig, what are you using for a mailreader?!).
The signature is valid for Joseph Carter's previous message.
> Thanks.
Nice to see some people are observant about this kind of thing :)
Attachment:
pgprpzUcpDYyM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: