Re: exim really does need to be the standard MTA in slink

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: exim really does need to be the standard MTA in slink
From: Guy Maor <maor@debian.org>
Date: 06 Oct 1998 23:41:04 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 871zokc1rz.fsf@femto.dyn.ml.org>
In-reply-to: "Steve Lamb"'s message of "Mon, 05 Oct 1998 21:58:21 -0700"
References: <[🔎] E0zQPbx-00012I-00@teleute.dyn.ml.org>

"Steve Lamb" <morpheus@teleute.ml.org> writes:

>     Supposedly it is about ready to be released.

Using a newly written MTA as our default sounds like a poor idea.


Guy

Reply to:

References:
- Re: exim really does need to be the standard MTA in slink
  - From: "Steve Lamb" <morpheus@teleute.ml.org>

Prev by Date: Re: what's after slink
Next by Date: Re: Finding a source package
Previous by thread: Re: exim really does need to be the standard MTA in slink
Next by thread: Re: exim really does need to be the standard MTA in slink
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread