Re: what's after slink
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> writes:
> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>]
> On Sat, Oct 03, 1998 at 06:57:54AM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > > I thought 2.2 was going to be "rc", and 3.0 would be "woody". Johnnie
> > > Ingram was pushing for that one, as were a few others.
> >
> > But didn't an even earlier discussion conclude that "woody" should be
> > bypassed as it would be offensive to some people.
>
> <extremely innocent look> Whyever for? It's just a word, a name used in a
> movie. Quite seriously, I think those few who would be offended take labels
> far too seriously, but then that's me.
Hmm. Maybe Debian 4.0 could be "chubby"?
.....A. P. Harris...apharris@onShore.com...<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: