Re: Ratifying the constitution
On Thu, 10 Sep 1998, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 1998, Santiago Vila wrote:
> : There may be unexpected problems, or wanted features, that we could be
> : missing because they are not self-evident just by reading the
> : constitution.
> So why don't you ratify the constitution, and propose amendments as new
> and unforeseen difficulties arise? That model has worked in the past.
Because amendments to the constitution are difficult on purpose.
"6e1df251b4bf6706d1a0fe32afb8ac3f" (a truly random sig)