[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Intent to package



	I intentd to package (have done already but will check before
upload) these packages:

 Package: dns-browse
 Version: 1.6-1
 Section: net
 Priority: extra
 Architecture: i386
 Depends: dnsutils, wish, perl
 Installed-Size: 52
 Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <jfs@computer.org>
 Description: Perl Modules providing an API for DNS queries
  Net::DNS is a Perl interface to the DNS resolver.  It allows the
  programmer to perform any type of DNS query from a Perl script.
  For details and examples, please read the Net::DNS manual page.

 Package: net-dns
 Version: 0.12-1
 Section: net
 Priority: extra
 Architecture: i386
 Depends: perl
 Installed-Size: 407
 Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <jfs@computer.org>
 Description: Perl Modules providing an API for DNS queries
  Net::DNS is a Perl interface to the DNS resolver.  It allows the
  programmer to perform any type of DNS query from a Perl script.
  For details and examples, please read the Net::DNS manual page.

	Also:

 - net-whois 
This is a Perl 5 module that retrieves and parses information from the
InterNIC 'whois' database.  If you are behind a firewall, you probably
won't be able to use this module.

 - pppcosts
	Program to calculate how much amount is spent on a PPP connection,
since it needs some source modifications to be able to use the same binary
for any country. I will check that it does provide different functionality
of dialdcosts's:
 Package: pppcosts
 Version: 0.05-1
 Architecture: i386
 Depends: libc5 (>= 5.4.0-0)
 Installed-Size: 58
 Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <jfs@computer.org>
 Description: Controls PPP usage
  PPPcosts controls usage of PPP connection both by time and money
  (supports many countries). It can be modified to signal when a
  'step' is going to pass or when PPP goes on for too long.

 - vrmllibc++: A VRML lib for C++, by Satoshi Konno 1996-1998
 (have to check licence though)

	Regards

	Javi


Reply to: