Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell?

To: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>, Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell?
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 13:48:44 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980830134844.V28337@test.legislate.com>
Mail-followup-to: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>, Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.SOL.3.95q.980830174105.1764C-100000@red.csi.cam.ac.uk>; from Jules Bean on Sun, Aug 30, 1998 at 05:41:57PM +0100
References: <[🔎] Pine.SOL.3.95q.980830173114.1764A-100000@red.csi.cam.ac.uk> <[🔎] Pine.SOL.3.95q.980830174105.1764C-100000@red.csi.cam.ac.uk>

Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Not much there on statically linked files at all.  Anyone care to point me
> to a discussion on this?

Well... before that, how about just checking out:

The FSSTND-FAQ (or the FSSTND itself),

lintian,

http://www.debian.org/security/info/nlspath.html

Interestingly enough, I didn't find anything in the policy manual
that seemed particularly relevant.

-- 
Raul

Reply to:

References:
- Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell?
  - From: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
- Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell?
  - From: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Bugs ?
Next by Date: Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell?
Previous by thread: Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell?
Next by thread: Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread