[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Naming of new 2.0 release

On Wed, 26 Aug 1998 21:45:17 -0700, Nathan Sandver wrote:

>	You have just very plainly stated that the two are one in the same,
>yet you continue to insist that one is deceitful. If the two are the same,
>then either BOTH are deceitful, or NEITHER is deceitful.

    The both *MEAN* the same.  I didn't say they *ARE* the same.  Mean the
same.  They both mean Major version 2, minor version 0, revision 1.  The
difference is that one follows the standard numbering scheme that has been in
place for years, and the other is in place because vendors wanted something
to allow them to continue to sell their stock.  Take a guess which is which.

             Steve C. Lamb             | Opinions expressed by me are not my
    http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus    | employer's.  They hired me for my
             ICQ: 5107343              | skills and labor, not my opinions!

Reply to: