[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Naming of new 2.0 release

On Tue, 25 Aug 1998, Steve Lamb wrote:

 : On Tue, 25 Aug 1998 11:12:59 +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
 : >Why are we arguing about this ?
 :     I agree.
 : >  1)  There is no useful difference between 2.0.1 and 2.0 r1
 : >  2)  It would be better to have 2.0 r? for marketing reasons
 :     I can't believe that anything wins because of "marketing reasons".  What
 : are we, Microsoft?

This is getting out of hand.  PLEASE go read the archives from about 12
months ago - pay close attention to posts from Bruce Perens, Paul Wade
and (gulp) Dave Cinege[1].  These are the most vocal participants that I
can recall - surely there were countless others.  As Christian Hudon
points out, the current scheme is in place, so why argue it all out

[1] - You don't have to read ALL of Dave's messages :)

Nathan Norman
MidcoNet  410 South Phillips Avenue  Sioux Falls, SD
mailto:finn@midco.net           http://www.midco.net
finger finn@home.midco.net for PGP Key: (0xA33B86E9)

Reply to: