[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Hamm Install



Could be.  Since the installation worked with the first option, I didn't delve
too deeply into the other.  I just figured I'd put a Head's Up here for "whom
it may concern"

On 20-Aug-98 Enrique Zanardi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 1998 at 12:48:31PM -0700, Darren Benham wrote:
>> Well, I've found two -- consistant -- problems doing a Hamm install:
>> 
>> Setup)  I'm booting for CD and installing that process.
>> 
>> 1)  There's an option, when looking for "floppy images", I'm offered a list
>> of
>> two  .../disks-i386/2.0.10-1998-07-17 and ... 1998-07-21.. if I select the
>> -21
>> image I get errors telling me the image couldn't be found.  If I use -17,
>> everything works fine.
> 
> Weird. I've done a few CDs using the debian-cd package and an up-to-date
> mirror, and have installed Debian 2.0 in a few boxes. I've used both
> options and both worked. Perhaps your CD is buggy?
>  
> -- 
> Enrique Zanardi                                       ezanardi@ull.es
> 
> 
> --  
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

----------------------------------
http://benham.net/index.html
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++ E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--)
O M-- V- PS-- PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++
 DI+++ D++ G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
----------------------------------


Reply to: